February 20, 2013

Joe Nocera Is Wrong on Canadian Oil Sands

Brad Plumer, Washington Post


WP

In his column on the Keystone XL pipeline today, Joe Nocera argues that a tax on carbon emissions would actually provide a boost to advanced fossil-fuel projects like the tar sands in Canada. That’s not quite, but it’s worth exploring why in a bit more detail.

Read Full Article ››

TAGGED: Carbon Tax, Keystone, Oil Sands, Canada

RECOMMENDED ARTICLES

Carbon taxes are in vogue. Economists’ predilection for price signals as the universal solution has fused with environmentalists’ impulse to punish Big Oil and Big Coal to make carbon taxes the darling of the ... more ››
October 24, 2013
Next Oil Sands Threat: Cracking Caprock
Andrew Nikiforuk, Resilience
A recent blow-out at Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.'s Primrose facility in northern Alberta sheds light on a serious but little discussed topic in the oil sands industry: caprock integrity. . . more ››
October 21, 2013
Canada's Confident of Its LNG Chops
W.R. Mead, American Interest
Canada’s top energy minister is confident that his country can hold its own in the world’s liquified natural gas (LNG) market. . . more ››
October 17, 2013
How Canada Could be an Energy Super Power
Jim Baird, EC
In 2006 Prime Minister Harper proclaimed Canada an energy superpower because of its vast oil, gas and uranium reserves. Unfortunately this is neither the reality, nor what the world is demanding. more ››
October 14, 2013
A $35 Billion Middle of Nowhere
Dave Forest, OilPrice.com
Few investors have heard of Kitimat, Canada. But this town of just over 8,000 people looks to be at the epicentre of a multi-billion dollar boom. . . more ››