February 1, 2013

Energy Funding Is About to Get Slashed

Kevin Bullis, MIT Technology Review


MIT

As a result of impending mandatory spending cuts known as sequestration, the first 100 days of President Obama’s second term couldn’t be more different from those of his first. If sequestration kicks in, federal support for clean energy, which received a $90 billion jolt from the stimulus package four years ago, is likely to decrease­, even though the need for energy breakthroughs to cut carbon dioxide emissions is clearer than ever (see “Solving Global Warming Will Require Far Greater Cuts than Thought”).

Read Full Article ››

TAGGED: clean energy

RECOMMENDED ARTICLES

Dr Jeffrey Sachs, Director of The Earth Institute at Columbia University and Special Advisor to the United Nations Secretary‐General on the Millennium Development Goals, gave one of the strongest presentations of the first-ever... more ››
February 1, 2013
Is Clean Energy an Impossible Dream?
Taylor & Van Doren, Huff Post
Don't get us wrong: If low-polluting renewable energy sources could displace fossil fuels without massive taxpayer subsidies that would harm the economy, you'd find us at the front of the parade. But President Obama's undying... more ››
January 25, 2013
Obama's Bonfire of Clean Energy Inanities
Peter Glover, Energy Tribune
President Obama, as his Inauguration Address confirms, is in denial about both the climate and energy realities. Repeating the most alarmist rhetoric of ideologue-turned-salesman to oil interests Al Gore, Obama appeared ignorant... more ››
Transforming the U.S. (and global) energy system from fossil fuels to low-carbon technologies requires a healthy, publicly supported innovation ecosystem that invests in and supports research, development, demonstration, and... more ››
January 24, 2013
Natural Gas Is Just What Clean Energy Needs
Arno Harris, Fortune
Exporting natural gas would be more likely to displace coal both at home and abroad, resulting in a lower net carbon emissions overall. . . more ››