January 24, 2013

Will California Be the Next Big Shale Oil Play?

Geoffrey Styles, The Energy Collective


wikipedia

I've spent the last couple of weeks contemplating California's Monterey shale, which has been widely discussed recently as the country's next Bakken-style oil play, or even bigger.  The Bakken shale has turned North Dakota into the second-biggest oil-producing state in the US, at the same time that development of the Eagle Ford shale has been shoring up Texas's claim to the number one spot. So far, The Golden State has largely missed out on the shale revolution, despite having shale oil resources estimated to exceed the rest of the US combined. The...

Read Full Article ››

TAGGED: oil, shale oil, California

RECOMMENDED ARTICLES

January 16, 2013
Does Crude by Rail Make Sense?
Deborah Rogers, EnergyPolicyForum
Bloomberg published an article regarding the new frenzy of shipping domestic crude, particularly tight oil from shales, by rail rather than pipeline. This decision by shale operators is interesting for various reasons but most... more ››
January 15, 2013
California Could Be Next Oil Boom State
Steve Hargreaves, CNNMoney
California is sitting on a massive amount of shale oil and could become the next oil boom state. But only if the industry can get the stuff out of the ground without upsetting the state's powerful environmental lobby. . . more ››
January 17, 2013
Golden State Oil Gusher
Mark Mills, Wall Street Journal
Could 2013 find California lawmakers and Gov. Jerry Brown finally making the connection between fiscal challenges and energy markets? The Golden State is well positioned to become an exporter of hydrocarbons and enjoy a gusher... more ››
January 11, 2013
New York's Clean Tech Challenge to California
Todd Woody, Forbes
January 16, 2013
Jerry Brown Chided for Green Spending Spree Plan
C. Megerian , LAT
When Legislative Analyst Mac Taylor rolled out his review of Gov. Jerry Brown's budget proposal on Monday, some of his sharpest criticisms involved plans for new tax money generated by a change in corporate taxes. . . more ››