December 27, 2012

Is Nuclear Necessary to Solve Global Warming?

Neil Hirst, Guardian


Rediff

The relative costs and benefits of nuclear energy have been the subject of heated debate in recent years thanks to a combination of factors, including the need to cut carbon emissions and the 2011 accident at Fukushima, Japan. Critics argue that nuclear is not only dangerous but also unnecessary for tackling climate change; supporters claim the risks are small and that abandoning nuclear would make an already huge challenge even harder and more expensive.

Read Full Article ››

TAGGED: Coal, natural gas, electric, carbon dioxide, Fukushima, global warming, climate change, nuclear energy

RECOMMENDED ARTICLES

December 18, 2012
Coal Boom Raises Climate Concerns
Tom Zeller Jr., Huffington Post
In a report destined to frustrate advocates for global action on climate change, the Paris-based International Energy Agency projected Tuesday morning that in five years' time, the amount of coal burned around the globe every... more ››
December 18, 2012
6 Ways to Play Energy in 2013
Sean Williams, Daily Finance
U.S. energy independence is a hot topic in Washington, and discovering how to produce energy from as many sources as possible is one way the U.S. can reach its goal of greater or complete independence. Here are six considerations... more ››
December 19, 2012
Energy Predictions and Nils Bohr
William Tucker, Nuclear Townhall
“Predictions are hard, especially about the future.” That was Nils Bohr’s aphorism that made it into history, although in another one of those unpredictable twists the quote is now being attributed to Yogi... more ››
December 19, 2012
A Major Setback for Carbon Capture & Storage
David Hone, EC
Perhaps the best thirty minutes I spent at COP18 in Doha was listening to a presentation by Myles Allan, Professor of Geosystem Science in the School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford and Head of the Climate... more ››