Advertisement

February 22, 2012

Besieged Climate Scientist Tells His Story

Goldenberg & West, The Atlantic


aussieinfo.com

It is almost possible to dismiss Michael Mann's account of a conspiracy by the fossil-fuel industry to harrass scientists and befuddle the public. His story of that campaign, and his own journey from naive computer geek to battle-hardened climate ninja, seems overwrought, maybe even paranoid. . .

Read Full Article ››

TAGGED: Michael Mann, climate science, global warming, climate change, The Atlantic

RECOMMENDED ARTICLES

February 10, 2012
Climate Science Goes Megalomaniacal
Franklin Spinney, CounterPunch
A February 6 report in the Guardian describes budding efforts to displace decarbonizing with geo-engineering as the goal for reducing the predicted catastrophic effects of global warming.  At present, these efforts are... more ››
February 17, 2012
Leaked Heartland Docs--But Is One a Fake?
Megan McArdle, Atlantic
The climate blogs have been swept by quite a scoop in the past few days.  An anonymous leaker identified only as "Heartland Insider" has dumped a cache of documents on climate blogs purporting to reveal the inner workings of... more ››
February 16, 2012
The Heartland Scandal & the Climate Fight
Andrew Revkin, NY Times
The Heartland Institute, a private group backed by industry and independent donors opposed to government regulation, has for years supported an array of efforts fighting restrictions on greenhouse gases. There’s no great... more ››
February 20, 2012
Warming Skeptics Gaining Upper Hand
Mark Landsbaum, OC Register
For quite some time, S. Fred Singer waged a quixotic campaign fighting windmills, so to speak. He disputed the claims of global warming alarmists that mankind is dangerously overheating the Earth, a claim that, not so... more ››
February 21, 2012
Scientists Reply on Global Warming
Trenberth, et al., Wall Street Journal
The interest generated by our Wall Street Journal op-ed of Jan. 27, "No Need to Panic about Global Warming," is gratifying but so extensive that we will limit our response to the letter to the editor the Journal published on... more ››
|