Advertisement

February 21, 2012

Scientists Reply on Global Warming

Trenberth, Wall Street Journal


unknown

The interest generated by our Wall Street Journal op-ed of Jan. 27, "No Need to Panic about Global Warming," is gratifying but so extensive that we will limit our response to the letter to the editor the Journal published on Feb. 1, 2012 by Kevin Trenberth and 37 other signatories, and to the Feb. 6 letter by Robert Byer, President of the American Physical Society. (We, of course, thank the writers of supportive letters. . .)

Read Full Article ››

TAGGED: climate science, climate change, global warming, Wall Street Journal

RECOMMENDED ARTICLES

February 8, 2012
Europe's Carbon Trade War
Editorial, Wall Street Journal
Does the world need a new trade war? Probably not, though our friends in Brussels seem to think so: Over intense international protest, they've plowed ahead with a new tax that requires airlines to purchase carbon emissions... more ››
February 10, 2012
Climate Science Goes Megalomaniacal
Franklin Spinney, CounterPunch
A February 6 report in the Guardian describes budding efforts to displace decarbonizing with geo-engineering as the goal for reducing the predicted catastrophic effects of global warming.  At present, these efforts are... more ››
February 16, 2012
The Heartland Scandal & the Climate Fight
Andrew Revkin, NY Times
The Heartland Institute, a private group backed by industry and independent donors opposed to government regulation, has for years supported an array of efforts fighting restrictions on greenhouse gases. There’s no great... more ››
February 20, 2012
Warming Skeptics Gaining Upper Hand
Mark Landsbaum, OC Register
For quite some time, S. Fred Singer waged a quixotic campaign fighting windmills, so to speak. He disputed the claims of global warming alarmists that mankind is dangerously overheating the Earth, a claim that, not so... more ››
|