 newyorktimes.com As 500 workers in hazmat suits and respirator masks fanned out to decontaminate this village 20 miles from the ravaged Fukushima Daiichi nuclear reactors, their confusion was apparent. “Dig five centimeters or 10 centimeters deep here?” a site supervisor asked his colleagues, pointing to a patch of radioactive topsoil to be removed. . . TAGGED: environmental impact, health impact, radiation, nuclear disaster, nuclear safety, nuclear energy, Fukushima, Japan, New York TimesRECOMMENDED ARTICLES| These days, a mask, protective clothing and radiation counter have all become a usual part of reporting trips, as essential as a camera, lenses and a laptop. Soon, this situation will have gone on for a full year. . . more ›› |
| The installation of wind turbines too close to houses and personal property is a major headache for the wind power industry, but headache scarcely begins to describe their impact to nearby property owners and neighbors. My... more ›› |
| Despite a tumultuous year, the nuclear energy sector says that it is well-prepared for the future and can withstand whatever Mother Nature throws at it. That’s also what regulators are saying, noting that if proper steps... more ›› |
| With the release of a computer model of all known geologic faults east of Denver, nearly all of the nuclear power plants in the United States are about to embark on a broad re-evaluation of their vulnerability to earthquakes.... more ›› |
| If you’ve felt jumpy since Fukushima, you’re not alone. Even the tiniest burp from a nuclear power plant gets people fearing the worst, so it was scary news indeed when the San Onofre plant in San Diego County... more ›› |
| |
